Finding Fanny (2014 India): Review

download              Finding_Fanny_Theatrical_release_poster                   images

A lovely little movie to stumble upon. That sweet find. It brings to mind the old movies that had a Parsi family set up that are so much fun to watch.

This is a hilarious movie. Again, the way I want to be made to laugh. No stunts here, with dogs, or fart jokes or belittling of anyone (except themselves perhaps! and each other of course).

Some excellent performances by Pankaj Kapur, Naseeruddin Shah, Dimple Kapadia, Deepika Padukone & Arjun Kapoor. In short, everyone.  Pankaj Kapoor especially, one tends to forget that he worked in both Maqbool and Office Office. His diction is delicious, and he nails the character superbly. He is Don Pedro.

Dimple Kapadia, similarly does a commendable job on Rosie. With her performances one always feels like it can dip and dim, there is no saying when she might falter, especially in not heavily written / dense movies such as this one.  She keeps the thread very well in this one though.

Naseeruddin Shah, is quite surprising, and for him, after so many excellent movies to his credit, is something of a rare thing. By now we have seen him in almost every role or that is what it feels like. We have seen him as the blind man, as the joker, as a bohemian photographer, as a rickshaw driver, as a main villian, a poet, as a common man. I mean, it feels like he has played so many people in our world. And yet, he comes in again here, in a completely new persona, let us pray that fatigue never touches him.

Deepika Padukone is a surprise in the beginning of the movie, she is so completely calm. I love particularly the scene where she casually cuts of a rooster’s head and walks with it. Or the time she stops Ferdie from crying. Many gems of scene to be found. Calm she may be, but I missed the vulnerability a little. Too confident perhaps? Her scenes with Savio were the weakest of the lot.

Arjun Kapoor is fine. Really, that is it. He is there but not quite so, and it is always fun when he decides to talk.

Now, lets get to the story, it is a road trip movie, well written with lovely characters. A Story!!! Finally there is a story. And there is some hilarious repartee.  There are some exceptional places to see, this is always great. The small town in Goa is very similar to all the coastal small towns that I have seen.

There are some experiments that have been carried out with imagery. Such work was seen in ‘Being Cyrus’ as well, the first movie of director Homi Adjania. And in this movie as well, it is fun. It doesn’t nail anything, and remains quirky at best, but still, it is something fun to see. The costumes are great. It could have been shot better. It could have been visually tighter. The direction is great.

The whole movie is in english by the way! But never for a moment does it feel strange. Imagine that!

What a what a fun movie to watch.

 

 

 

Review of ‘Shaadi Ke Side Effects’

download (2)

A highly average movie with very low production values. The dialogue which is also average fare keeps the movie going.

The movie has been produced by Pritish Nandy Communications and Balaji Films. The writer/director is Saket Choudhary who has also made the Part one of this movie, Pyar Ke Side Effects. Pyar Ke Side Effects was a quirky, funny rom-com which was quite satisfactory and even nice. However this sequel doesn’t quite add up.

The story of the sequel begins with a married couple, and moves on to how they cope with the arrival of a child and how this affects them, and in particular the husband. I imagine the movie is about that. As ultimately it does feel like the movie is about nothing, definitely nothing more than an episodic adventure of a married couple. A deeply flawed married couple at that, or maybe just badly written.

I do think that films with a low budget can still have excellent production values. Many films come to mind here. And the sub-standard visuals of this movie that add to our pain aren’t very forgivable.

The story itself leaves one dissatisfied. None of the narratives are explored to any extent, and after a point one would have started to get annoyed with the continued, consistent and frankly boring angst of the husband, which is what is explored throughout the movie, if it was not for the unassuming and earnest performance put in by Farhan Akhtar. You do stay with him throughout the movie. However much you want to sock him in the eye for his lack of any kind of relationship with his child!

The commitment phobic male unsure of being a father is a great plot for a movie and it has been used often enough with great success. ‘Nine Months’ of Hugh Grant comes immediately to mind. ‘He Is Just Not That Into You’, ‘Juno’ are some other movies that come to mind. Although there must be hundreds more! And for one of the very beautiful, deeply delved into exploration, there is ‘The Hours’ albeit from a female perspective. A reluctance however to delve into the characters except as caricatures of urban myths, lets us down quite badly in this movie.

Vidya Balan is not someone I have enjoyed watching a lot. And the same continues with this movie. But the one factor that binds both the lead actors is that they are what we have today as an alternative to the star system that exists in Indian movies. These guys are able to or are given the opportunity to become just the characters. They have become synonymous with, and champions of, the half-commercial/half-independent movies.  They aren’t great substitutes for Amol Palekar, Deepti Naval, the charming Farooque Sheikh, Naseeruddin Shah, Om Puri, Smita Patil, Shabana Azmi and so on. And so to expect anything more spectacular than what they give us here is a wasteful exercise.

However, the ultimate downer in this movie remains to be the story and writing. A very mediocre effort. More than that this was not a very needed sequel to the original Pyar Ke Side Effects. It comes a few years too late and isn’t that funny.

This can be a big time miss. Better to wait for it come on TV.  Even then, only if you want to.

Highway is just plain wrong and Imtiaz Ali has lost the plot!

Review of Highway, movie 2014

There are many choice words that come to mind while sitting down to write this review for ‘Highway’, Imtiaz Ali’s latest movie. You can find my review for his last film Rockstar here.

He continues to pile up the mistakes! The story premises of both these movies are absurd, weirdly heroic and utterly nonsensical. Not enough good writing on either!

A young girl is kidnapped by a rough villager and a petty criminal. Alia Bhatt doesn’t have the depth as an actor that is required to potray the multiple complexities of what she has to deal with. Her potrayal is that of a typical Bollywood heroine, who is cute and bubbly, just in a different & strange circumstance. For those who don’t watch Telugu and Tamil movies, this particular type of characterization of a female lead is common place. Really.Most of the tamil/telugu heroines are slightly mad/off and take strange decisions in their screen lives with the sole intention of helping their directors/writers make their movie stranger/more different from any other movie. So first let’s establish the fact that what Imtiaz Ali does is not any different from these film makers in that regard. He is definitely not avante garde, honestly he should just stop trying. Give us and himself a break. He should try and be a bit more happy. Take a leaf from his own heros/heroines’ stories. Take a road trip by himself. Liberate himself off these expectations that he saddles himself with. Something.

Alia Bhatt and Randeep Hooda both have stilted dialogue delivery. They appear great in wide angle shots with no dialogue but the minute they have to open their mouths they become what they probably are in real life because they definitely do not become the characters they are supposed to potray. A haryanvi/delhi accent does not make you authentic. While Alia gives a one note dialogue delivery of madness and cuteness, Randeep gives a one note dialogue delivery of anger and whatever else (always sticking to that one note, one can’t find a layer if one digs even a hundred meters deep!).

The problems of the actors are far more forgivable however, than the problems of the story. Imtiaz Ali thinks he is delving into deep social economic problems (which are forced into the script) while he is not. In fact, this movie was a bit like watching ‘Guru’ where one came face to face with Mani Ratnam’s lack of any real grasp of the idea of capitalism. This film similarly gives a taste of Imtiaz Ali’s incomprehension of any deep/dark psyche of human nature  along with his complete lack of any socio-political understanding of society.

The story combines elements of ‘Lady Chatterly’s lover’ (for those of whom who haven’t read this, it is about a repressed lady in classist England finding love and sex with her gardener on the estate who is from the lowest of the classes) and of course the Stockholm Syndrome. The casualness with which the latter is dealt with is baffling. Why would one take up such a complex matter as Stockholm syndrome and want to play ball with it? Alia’s character has a reasonably hard time for a day with the kidnapping, and then in a heartbeat is chipper like sunshine. What bullsh*t. One wonders where the part of the brain that warns you when you are in danger has gone. Does she even realize the graveness of the situation she is in? Does the director realize this? Are we all supposed to have this mindset towards criminal abductions? Charm your kidnapper, be cute as kitten and hope for the best? We are supposed to believe this? To add insult to injury, Alia after the first day of abduction, starts saying things to her abductors like – ‘I want to come out in the open with you and don’t want to be in a closed room, I want to see more. Are holidays supposed to be like this? For me they have always have been about hotel rooms’ etc (one wonders if she just couldn’t have taken a euro train like Kajol in DDLJ and gotten it over with, but this is too sane a choice for the mad cap, strange character played by Alia). Liberation, for a rich kid, who has gone through abuse as a child. My god! Who sits around decides the stories for these movies? Imbeciles? They must have added abuse to give it depth. Definitely felt like a forced plot intervention!

This is a bad story, that is badly or hardly written. There are possibilities with explorations of characters and situations that just don’t happen. And as an audience (with or without money) if I am investing my time and emotions in your film, then don’t be lazy about it. Think some things through. Do some homework on the story itself, get your dialogues written. This basic courtesy I expect. I am least interested in your inner angst and demons. Why should I be?

This is not Imtiaz Ali’s venturing into the darkness but him delivering his brand of lightness from a supposed darkness that he can’t comprehend. He is making a love story still, but just doesn’t want to admit to it. What this inner fight of his translates itself into, for us, movie goers is not a pretty image.

I would like to close this by mentioning my earlier words on Rockstar –

If Imtiaz Ali is bored by the kind of romance that he worked with initially, then we are in for some strange movie watching experience courtesy him in the future. “

With Highway he has proved me right, this movie is stranger than strange. And a lazy, dishonest effort on the part of the film maker. Can’t really say about awards (really who can!) but he is definitely collecting bad karma for this (and Rockstar).

Review of Hasee Toh Phasee

Hasee Toh Phasee

One wonders about the name of the movie. Why this name? But otherwise, this is a pretty damn perfect romantic comedy.

All good romantic comedies have some often used tropes –

1) The girl or boy is a bit off. By off I mean – nerdy, strange haircuts, irregular habits

2) The girl and the boy don’t immediately fall in love, or even if they do, they take a real long time to admit it to themselves

3) The boy and the girl, both help to realize each other’s dreams (I wanted to be a business manager but I have been a playboy because I was bored, or I have always wanted to be a doctor, but I was too busy being lazy, so on and so forth, which they all overcome after they fall in love)

4) There is something big that keeps the boy and the girl apart (a girl is pretending to be a boy so the boyfriend has to deal with being a homosexual, both are of the same sex and hence face a lot of issues, one is much elder than the other and other such things)

If you have watched as many Korean Romantic Comedy movies as I have, you would realize that these are pretty much constant in every good romantic comedy. And also, how easy it is to achieve this on some level (or it should be easy).

Coming to Indian movies, it has always baffled me as to why these simple things could not be achieved so easily. Why it took such great effort for us to achieve such simple story telling. Why we always had girls and boys who are perfect, who dress extravagantly and have perfect hair at all points of time. Unreal sets and unreal characters. Where is the fun!!

But this film has hit the nail on its head. With the astounding supporting cast who come with perfect comic timing, to the simple telling of a story, to capturing the romance so well. It has done it all. This is how I want to laugh in a movie. This is how I want to be made to laugh. Let’s not even mention the unmentionables who are giving us questionable comedy at this point of time.

The humor in this movie is subtle, dramatic, so well crafted and so utterly delicious. The writing is excellent. Often people assume that comedies, and romantic ones at that are easy to pen. But in fact I find that romantic comedy is one of the hardest genres to write for and even make. Yes ,even act in. So to fall across this gem is truly delightful. It doesn’t happen often in Indian movies, and one often has to settle for something as inane as ‘Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani’ (also from the same production house)

The direction, and all other technical departments are spot on. And a special mention has to be made about the cinematography, because here we see the meeting of Karan Johar and Anurag Kashyap streams of Indian Cinema (Yeh Jawani… meets Aamir). And it’s good, nothing to fear. No harm is done. Phew. And we in turn get to see some lovely visuals, Indian cities that look like Indian cities, and still are so beautiful, especially in the early morning and early evening light. We see sets that are true to life, even people. Unlike a polished gang of Kal Ho Na Ho, and other such tripe.

Loved the film and the entire cast. I never really expected to find Parineeti Chopra and Siddharth Malhotra so utterly charming. Happy to see Vikramaditya Motwane and Anurag Kashyap as the executive producers. I am not a big fan of Anurag Kashyap’s films, and not at all a fan of his writing which I find highly limiting. But the movies that he executive produces? they are all gold. Almost all such movies have been great experiences- Udaan and Aamir come to mind immediately. So it goes with this movie also, the visuals are a bit different, true to life, and lovely. Same as the characters.

Again, loved it. WATCH THIS! A great way to spend 2 and half hours of your time. A happy film.

Review: American Hustle

American hustle is the new film by David Russell. It stars Amy Adams, Christian Bale, Jennifer Lawrence, Bradley Cooper, Jeremy Renner and others. It is a delicious heist/con men movie, populated by characters that feel very real. One wonders, what a great movie this would have been if Russell had gone the entire way and made it only about the wonderful characters that he has created.

The movie is a fictionalized account of the ABSCAM incident that occured in America in the 70s. A covert operation to unearth corruption / scams by the FBI. We get to see this story through the eyes of two small time hustlers. The writing is superb and the acting is something special to behold. There are glimpses in the movie which allude to the eternal hustle of life that we lead. There is a strength of survival, a lust for life that is evident in the hustlers, there are lovely glimpses into the intricate plots that we/the characters weave inside while being confronted with the real choices in front of them. This finally is the strength of the movie. The glimpses that we get into human nature really.

   

As the movie ends, there is a bit of a clean wrap-up in terms of the plot, and somehow somewhere, the movie lost out on greatness. The ending could have elevated or messed it up, but in this movie, it ended up merely patching things up. A great movie to watch, but somewhere it lost out on memorability. Perhaps if we didn’t know who won in the end, it would have remained a hustle. Perhaps if we didn’t see every character attain his plot wise end, we would have made more connections than those that were presented to us. Perhaps.

However, some of the most delicious moments of acting can be savored, some beautiful characters can be watched through the course of this movie.

A lovely movie, ultimately forgettable perhaps, but still, worth a watch.

   

Dedh Ishqiya is tricky and clever but little else.

A sequel is never a pleasant business. The expectations from the first film are very high, and the characters need to float away from the story to accommodate a new installment. All this happens and well in the new film from the Ishqiya franchise. But, to what end.

  

There is an immersion in the culture of bygone eras which is always nice to see, and although there are some interesting characters written into the movie which is hard to come by easily in Indian films, and although the language is music in itself throughout the movie, the movie eventually falls short of its first installment in many ways.

While the first one was a delicious slice of life movie, the second one aims at being a clever mystery. That the two main characters are jokers is told to us by the main villain who lisps, in a direct reference to the Batman franchise. The irreverence is obvious and unsubtle, and this sets the tone for the rest of the movie.  That everyone involved is self -conscious of making a part two version is brought forward to us in many scenes. Therefore we ourselves end up being conscious of watching a part two version a la Dhoom.

The narrative reminds one of Tarantino, his pulp fiction-esque sideways movement of a movie. Stylish gangsters and revengeful poets who land up with machine guns from a moving train, a Malayalee policeman in the center of northern India, makes us feel like we are watching a set of gags filled with quirky characters. Finally Ishqiya goes neither this way nor that. It tries to do many things instead of just saying the story.

    

The pathos of a grand old faded begum and her maid is lost in all the lushness of the scenery. The dialogues skim around the ridiculous to slap stick, loaded with innuendos. The first half almost feels like a peep show into Indian sexuality, a little uncomfortable, a little self-conscious and mostly awkward. A terrible waste considering the effortlessness displayed in the first Ishqiya.

Madhuri shows her ineptness in working in a non-commercial format of which Vidya Balan is the reigning queen. She looks a little lost with the kind of acting required in the movie. A dhak dhak girl pushed into being a begum. Huma Qureshi does a good job but this moo phat heroine routine is frankly getting a bit boring. Arshad Warsi is good, but he gets these insane lines this time to deliver. A lesser actor would have bungled it up. Naseeruddin Shah is all pervasive, and in some ways this movie is more about his character than anyone else’s, but the writing lets him down quite fantastically. The theme of the two clowns is made a bit too obvious, and there is none of the subtlety that was there with the original.

    

The writing is entirely lack luster, un-original and lacks an honesty that was there in the first movie. This was no better than a Dhoom 3. A lush mess of story, story-telling, writing and intentions. This one was a dud.  Have to mention Vijay Raaz though, he shone!

     

Lincoln: 2013

Lincoln is a movie that follows the lines of many biopics. It has a central protagonist whose life we are tracing, and along the way we meet other characters who mainly illuminate the central protagonist. One of the better movies I have watched, Lincoln gives us all an experience of history, or rather historical times. Very articulate in its argument, this movie gave American English all kinds of possibilities. Many views were proposed opposed and presented with beautiful use of language (here I was thinking American English is all – y’all, how ya doin)

It was a professional team of actors, writers, directors and crew that brought us this and as such you are thankful for the experience. Because nobody slacked. Of course it is a bit too concentrated on Lincoln and his heroics (therefore it is called Lincoln and not The Amendment/The Bill or something) but one goes in expecting that to happen, after all we have watched many biopics before and we understand that a biopic is essentially just centered around one person and everything can be reduced to mere props. Lincoln does hold up here though, essentially due to the caliber of performances seen from the likes of Tommy Lee Jones and others.

Visually, it is a movie that remains faithful to the time and era it is based out of. There is hardly much visual storytelling but the beautifully shot movie, is  nonetheless delightful to watch.

 

Review: David (2013)

David is a quick movie, you can watch it for 1 min, 5 or 30. It is all the same. The reversals are some of the quickest and they keep happening every 2 seconds. In that sense it is like taking a series of rides in Essel World or whatever new amusement park is in town.

Women mouth bad language as if there is no tomorrow, the men drink, kill, make love etc and all very fast. There must be a section of the audience which will get desensitized to violence with this film., desensitized to pacing in a movie along with getting desensitized to bad movies overall. This movie here is a reversal of movies such as Housefull2, except they call themselves independent, different etc.

The movie is filled with such characters – a cool musician type, a cool fisherman type, a cool gangster, a cool gangster’s mol, a cool massage parlor owner, a cool fisherman’s cool mother, a cool everything. And whose idea of cool this? Bejoy Nambiar’s. Read the review of his first movie here. Bejoy Nambiar continues his bad film making sensibilities.

If one doesn’t have stories to tell, it is better if they pick up stories other’s have told, after all there is no dearth of either stories or literature in India.

Bejoy Nambiar continues to ride the gangster wave and coolness wave of Anurag Kashyap, albeit in a very unsure way, and gives us all something to run away from. What would an ideal response to this be for him I wonder? ‘Whoa! it is so cool dude. Awesome m**f**r’ – would this be it?

Review: Kadal (2013 Mani Ratnam)

Kadal is not about the ocean. It is hardly about the fishermen and fisherwomen. No it isn’t really about religion. It does try to be about the higher good and evil, I suppose. As if Mani Ratnam, having broached the subject of ‘bad’ and ‘good’ in Raavan, decides to continue with the same theme in his next movie.

I strangely had this feeling in the early moments of the movie that it was a personal search of Mani Ratnam’s. A question that he was pondering on and decided to make a movie out of. But after many choregraphed sequences of people coming out of nowhere, wearing Rajasthani costumes and dancing to New York type Jazz in a desert of white sand (and other such absurdities), I gave up. It was nothing. I suppose, a movie maker, as Mani Ratnam has established himself to be, has to make movies. And this one is his next movie.

I got over my personal disappointment with him (I was a big fan, and probably, simply by virtue of nostalgia, still am). After Guru, Raavan, any seasoned fan would have to admit defeat. So watching Kadal was essentially an exercise of habit. I still put this movie above the limitless and relentless cr** that comes out of Mumbai.

However, let’s list out the could have been’s and the should have been’s purely in the interest of a review.

1) The movie should have been about the boy, his illegitimacy, his disillusion (God! the possibilities with this story)

2)The evil and good here is clearly delineated in the characters. No fun to watch. Bad villian/ Good saintly opposite. Even if the boy was supposed to be treading the middle lines. He was no fun to watch at all after he grew up.

3)The setting is great until we reach the present (the early parts of the movie is set in the 1990s). The fishermen and the fisherwomen jump out of the screen. But once the ‘new age’ in India comes to pictures, everybody starts to look like everybody else. To the point that one would question why the ocean was used as a back drop for this story at all. This could have easily been based in the bylanes of Chennai.

4)The girl is mad. A convent educated, mad girl. The guy is nobody. By the time he grows up, he has lost his memory. So his eyes bear no witness to all he has seen and dealt with. He could be anybody. And is nobody.

5)Arjun Sarja is a weak villian. For a person who has to embody all the bad/evil in the world (not sure if the movie deserves such weighty suppositions), he falls pitiably short of his scope

6)Could be that Mani Ratnam might get it right the third time, the battle of the good and the evil.

Watch it I’d say, some sights are beautiful.

    

  

Inglourious Basterds & True Grit: Review

Inglourious Basterds

Really! The gall of this man! And not in a good way.

Ingloruious Basterds, is a crazy film with some good actors. Christopher Waltz, Michael Fassbender, Diane Kruger give us some really enjoyable scenes. The beginning scene of Christopher Waltz is something so delicious that it can be bit into. Until the story and the writing lets them and us down, then it is a free for all. In a crazy plot filled with juvenile delusions and fantasies, one loses out on all the richness of complications. Here, every single character is good or bad, like a Comic book, the posturing is crazy and it is so cool that it bleeds (is that even a saying?)

As I have really passed the age where being ‘cool’ or not is really not a consideration anymore, this movie is like salt-less food. Difficult to swallow. I feel like saying, to Quentin Tarantino this – ‘Go try this on someone else’. He he. (But obviously he has, and it has worked on those, and everybody’s made tons of money except those who paid for it, but still, Quentin Tarantino, go sit in a corner and reflect. Better still, take a package tour around the world!)

True Grit

Do you know there is also a food called Grits, eaten mostly by the people that this movie is about? It was like that this movie, it was like eating grits (I believe a little bit like Upma, not the spicy variety). The movie is also made with a lot of grit, to stick to one plot and one plot alone throughout the movie takes a quiet kind of grit, the characters in this movie are also filled with a lot of grit, the cinematography is quietly gritty.

Truly, truly gritty 🙂 🙂

    

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

goodnameforamovieblog

This WordPress.com site is the cat’s pajamas

Hollywood Fix!

An average movie blog for the average movie watcher

240 Films

"I know everything about film. I've seen over 240 of them"

loveyourfilms.wordpress.com/

A Blog For Every Movie Lover

Juggernaut Post

Juggernaut News Every Day

The Grand Narrative

Korean Feminism, Sexuality, Popular Culture